Effects of rapid response systems on clinical outcomes: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
- 1 November 2007
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Hospital Medicine
- Vol. 2 (6) , 422-432
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.238
Abstract
BACKGROUND A rapid response system (RRS) consists of providers who immediately assess and treat unstable hospitalized patients. Examples include medical emergency teams and rapid response teams. Early reports of major improvements in patient outcomes led to widespread utilization of RRSs, despite the negative results of a subsequent cluster‐randomized trial. PURPOSE To evaluate the effects of RRSs on clinical outcomes through a systematic literature review. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, BIOSIS, and CINAHL searches through August 2006, review of conference proceedings and article bibliographies. STUDY SELECTION Randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials, interrupted time series, and before‐after studies reporting effects of an RRS on inpatient mortality, cardiopulmonary arrests, or unscheduled ICU admissions. DATA EXTRACTION Two authors independently determined study eligibility, abstracted data, and classified study quality. DATA SYNTHESIS Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria: 1 cluster‐randomized controlled trial (RCT), 1 interrupted time series, and 11 before‐after studies. The RCT showed no effects on any clinical outcome. Before‐after studies showed reductions in inpatient mortality (RR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.74‐0.91) and cardiac arrest (RR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.65‐0.83). However, these studies were of poor methodological quality, and control hospitals in the RCT reported reductions in mortality and cardiac arrest rates comparable to those in the before‐after studies. CONCLUSIONS Published studies of RRSs have not found consistent improvement in clinical outcomes and have been of poor methodological quality. The positive results of before‐after trials likely reflects secular trends and biased outcome ascertainment, as the improved outcomes they reported were of similar magnitude to those of the control group in the RCT. The effectiveness of the RRS concept remains unproven. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2007;2:422–432. © 2007 Society of Hospital Medicine.Keywords
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- Lessons Learned about Implementing Research Evidence into Clinical Practice.Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2006
- Toward Evidence-Based Quality Improvement.Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2006
- THE EFFECT OF TRANSITION FROM A TRADITIONAL CODE TEAM TO A RAPID RESPONSE TEAM IN A CHILDRENʼs CENTER: A BEFORE AND AFTER INTERVENTION TRIAL.Critical Care Medicine, 2005
- Evidence-Based Quality Improvement: The State Of The ScienceHealth Affairs, 2005
- A comparison of Antecedents to Cardiac Arrests, Deaths and EMergency Intensive care Admissions in Australia and New Zealand, and the United Kingdom—the ACADEMIA studyResuscitation, 2004
- Use of medical emergency team responses to reduce hospital cardiopulmonary arrestsQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2004
- Introducing Critical Care Outreach: a ward-randomised trial of phased introduction in a general hospitalIntensive Care Medicine, 2004
- Critical care outreach team's effect on patient outcome: Other conclusions are possibleBMJ, 2004
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2002