Should lidocaine be administered routinely to all patients after acute myocardial infarction?
- 1 October 1978
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 58 (4) , 581-584
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.58.4.581
Abstract
For more than 10 yr, coronary care units have used ECG monitoring for detecting and treating life-threatening arrhythmias in patients who have had acute myocardial infarction. It is opportune to reassess some of the principles that are used in many coronary care units for treating these patients. Whether all patients with acute infarction should receive antiarrhythmic drugs routinely to prevent primary ventricular fibrillation is reviewed.This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patients admitted to the coronary care unit for chest pain: High risk subgroup for subsequent cardiovascular deathThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1977
- Cardiac arrest complicating acute myocardial infarction: Predictability and prognosisThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1977
- Lignocaine: a new technique for intravenous administration.Heart, 1977
- Efficiency of arrhythmia detection by nurses in a coronary care unit using a decentralised monitoring system.Heart, 1977
- Pharmacologic therapy of ventricular arrhythmiasThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1975
- Evaluation of lidocaine resistance in man using intermittent large-dose infusion techniquesThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1974
- Comprehensive treatment plan for the prevention of primary ventricular fibrillation in acute myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1974
- Unreliability of conventional electrocardiography monitoring for arrhythmia detection in coronary care unitsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1973
- Primary ventricular fibrillation complicating acute myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1971
- The long-term prognosis for patients resuscitated after cardiac arrest: A follow-up studyAmerican Heart Journal, 1969