Instrumentalism, Parsimony, and the Akaike Framework
- 1 September 2002
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Philosophy of Science
- Vol. 69 (S3) , S112-S123
- https://doi.org/10.1086/341839
Abstract
Akaike's framework for thinking about model selection in terms of the goal of predictive accuracy and his criterion for model selection have important philosophical implications. Scientists often test models whose truth values they already know, and they often decline to reject models that they know full well are false. Instrumentalism helps explain this pervasive feature of scientific practice, and Akaike's framework helps provide instrumentalism with the epistemology it needs. Akaike's criterion for model selection also throws light on the role of parsimony considerations in hypothesis evaluation. I explain the basic ideas behind Akaike's framework and criterion; several biological examples, including the use of maximum likelihood methods in phylogenetic inference, are considered.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Selecting Models of Nucleotide Substitution: An Application to Human Immunodeficiency Virus 1 (HIV-1)Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2001
- Hard Problems in the Philosophy of Science: Idealisation and CommensurabilityPublished by Springer Nature ,2000
- Regression and Time Series Model SelectionPublished by World Scientific Pub Co Pte Ltd ,1998
- Model Selection and InferencePublished by Springer Nature ,1998
- Maximum Likelihood as an Alternative to Parsimony for Inferring Phylogeny Using Nucleotide Sequence DataPublished by Springer Nature ,1998
- The Scientific ImagePublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1980
- Evolution of Protein MoleculesPublished by Elsevier ,1969
- The Logic of Scientific DiscoveryPhysics Today, 1959