Comparing the Long-term Cost-effectiveness of Repaglinide Plus Metformin Versus Nateglinide Plus Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes Patients with Inadequate Glycaemic Control: An Application of the CORE Diabetes Model in Type 2 Diabetes
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Informa Healthcare in Current Medical Research and Opinion
- Vol. 20 (sup1) , S41-S51
- https://doi.org/10.1185/030079904x2015
Abstract
As an example application of the CORE Diabetes Model in type 2 diabetes, we simulated the cost-effectiveness of repaglinide/metformin combination therapy versus nateglinide/metformin for treatment of individuals with type 2 diabetes with an inadequate response to sulphonylurea, metformin, or fixed dose glyburide/metformin. The CORE Diabetes Model was used to simulate long-term outcomes for a cohort of individuals with type 2 diabetes treated with either repaglinide/metformin or nateglinide/metformin. HbA1c changes for each regimen were taken from a comparative study. At the end of the study, changes in HbA1c from baseline were -1.28% points and -0.67% points for repaglinide/metformin and nateglinide/metformin, respectively. Median final doses were 5.0 mg/day for repaglinide, 360 mg/day for nateglinide and 2000 mg/day metformin in each treatment arm. Costs were calculated as the annual costs for drugs plus costs of complications (US Medicare perspective) over a 30-year period. Life expectancy (LE) and quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) were calculated. Outcomes and costs were discounted at 3% annually. With repaglinide/metformin, improved glycaemic control led to projected decreases in complication rates, improvement of LE and QALE by 0.15 and 0.14 years respectively, and total cost savings of 3,662 dollars/person over the 30-year period. Repaglinide/metformin had a 96% probability that the incremental costs per quality-adjusted life year gained would be 20,000 dollars or less, and a 66% probability that repaglinide/metformin would be cost-saving compared to nateglinide/metformin. Sensitivity analyses supported the validity and reliability of the results. In the health economic context, repaglinide/metformin combination was dominant to nateglinide/metformin. The CORE Diabetes Model is a tool to help third-party reimbursement payers identify treatments for type 2 diabetes that are good value for money.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Direct Medical Cost of Type 2 DiabetesDiabetes Care, 2003
- Multifactorial Intervention and Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with Type 2 DiabetesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Economic Model of First-Line Drug Strategies to Achieve Recommended Glycaemic Control in Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes MellitusPharmacoEconomics, 2003
- The UKPDS risk engine: a model for the risk of coronary heart disease in Type II diabetes (UKPDS 56)Clinical Science, 2001
- AMCP Guidance for Submission of Clinical and Economic Evaluation Data to Support Formulary Listing in U.S. Health Plans and Pharmacy Benefits Management OrganizationsJournal of Managed Care Pharmacy, 2001
- Meglitinide Analogues in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes MellitusDrugs & Aging, 2000
- Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational studyBMJ, 2000
- The Economic Impact of DiabetesDiabetes Care, 1998
- Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33)The Lancet, 1998
- Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34)The Lancet, 1998