CENSORING ISSUES IN SURVIVAL ANALYSIS
- 1 May 1997
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Annual Reviews in Annual Review of Public Health
- Vol. 18 (1) , 83-104
- https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.18.1.83
Abstract
▪ Abstract A key characteristic that distinguishes survival analysis from other areas in statistics is that survival data are usually censored. Censoring occurs when incomplete information is available about the survival time of some individuals. We define censoring through some practical examples extracted from the literature in various fields of public health. With few exceptions, the censoring mechanisms in most observational studies are unknown and hence it is necessary to make assumptions about censoring when the common statistical methods are used to analyze censored data. In addition, we present situations in which censoring mechanisms can be ignored. The effects of the censoring assumptions are demonstrated through actual studies.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study: Retention after 9½ YearsAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1995
- Design of a multicenter trial to evaluate long-term life-style intervention in adults with high-normal blood pressure levels: Trials of hypertension prevention (phase II)Annals of Epidemiology, 1995
- Health insurance and mortality. Evidence from a national cohortPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1993
- Ignorability and Coarse DataThe Annals of Statistics, 1991
- Relative Information Loss Under Type II Censored Exponential DataBiometrika, 1990
- A Note on the Behaviour of the Log Rank Permutation Test Under Unequal CensoringBiometrika, 1983
- On the Loss of Information Through CensoringBiometrika, 1982
- On Constant-Sum Models for Censored Survival DataBiometrika, 1979
- Testing Survival Under Right Censoring and Left TruncationBiometrika, 1977
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958