Implicit Bias among Physicians and its Prediction of Thrombolysis Decisions for Black and White Patients
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 27 June 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Vol. 22 (9) , 1231-1238
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0258-5
Abstract
Studies documenting racial/ethnic disparities in health care frequently implicate physicians’ unconscious biases. No study to date has measured physicians’ unconscious racial bias to test whether this predicts physicians’ clinical decisions. To test whether physicians show implicit race bias and whether the magnitude of such bias predicts thrombolysis recommendations for black and white patients with acute coronary syndromes. An internet-based tool comprising a clinical vignette of a patient presenting to the emergency department with an acute coronary syndrome, followed by a questionnaire and three Implicit Association Tests (IATs). Study invitations were e-mailed to all internal medicine and emergency medicine residents at four academic medical centers in Atlanta and Boston; 287 completed the study, met inclusion criteria, and were randomized to either a black or white vignette patient. IAT scores (normal continuous variable) measuring physicians’ implicit race preference and perceptions of cooperativeness. Physicians’ attribution of symptoms to coronary artery disease for vignette patients with randomly assigned race, and their decisions about thrombolysis. Assessment of physicians’ explicit racial biases by questionnaire. Physicians reported no explicit preference for white versus black patients or differences in perceived cooperativeness. In contrast, IATs revealed implicit preference favoring white Americans (mean IAT score = 0.36, P < .001, one-sample t test) and implicit stereotypes of black Americans as less cooperative with medical procedures (mean IAT score 0.22, P < .001), and less cooperative generally (mean IAT score 0.30, P < .001). As physicians’ prowhite implicit bias increased, so did their likelihood of treating white patients and not treating black patients with thrombolysis (P = .009). This study represents the first evidence of unconscious (implicit) race bias among physicians, its dissociation from conscious (explicit) bias, and its predictive validity. Results suggest that physicians’ unconscious biases may contribute to racial/ethnic disparities in use of medical procedures such as thrombolysis for myocardial infarction.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003
- Why can't we just get along? Interpersonal biases and interracial distrust.Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 2002
- Factors Influencing Physicians’ Judgments of Adherence and Treatment Decisions for Patients with HIV DiseaseMedical Decision Making, 2001
- The Effect of Race on the Referral Process for Invasive Cardiac ProceduresMedical Care Research and Review, 2000
- The Effect of Patients' Preferences on Racial Differences in Access to Renal TransplantationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Management and outcomes for black patients with acute myocardial infarction in the reperfusion eraThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1998
- Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998
- Variability in automatic activation as an unobstrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995
- Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes.Psychological Review, 1995
- Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989