The physiologic fallacy of adjusting for body weight in performance of the Master two-step test
- 31 October 1965
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in American Heart Journal
- Vol. 70 (4) , 461-465
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(65)90357-1
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cardiac output during submaximal and maximal workJournal of Applied Physiology, 1964
- Use of the electrocardiogram in exercise testsAmerican Heart Journal, 1963
- Two step exercise test as a test of cardiac function in chronic rheumatic heart disease and in arteriosclerotic heart disease with old myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1961
- ENERGY COST OF THE MASTER TWO-STEP TESTJAMA, 1957
- The electrocardiographic exercise test: Changes in the scalar ecg and in the mean spatial QRS and T vectors in two types of exercise; Effect of absolute and relative body weight and comment on normal standardsAmerican Heart Journal, 1956
- Maximal Oxygen Intake as an Objective Measure of Cardio-Respiratory PerformanceJournal of Applied Physiology, 1955
- THE ENERGY COST OF HORIZONTAL AND GRADE WALKING ON THE MOTOR-DRIVEN TREADMILLAmerican Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, 1946
- THE ELECTROCARDIOGRAM AND THE “TWO-STEP” EXERCISEThe Lancet Healthy Longevity, 1944
- The two-step test of myocardial functionAmerican Heart Journal, 1935
- A SIMPLE EXERCISE TOLERANCE TEST FOR CIRCULATORY EFFICIENCY WITH STANDARD TABLES FOR NORMAL INDIVIDUALSThe Lancet Healthy Longevity, 1929