Quality of Care
- 1 December 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of General Psychiatry
- Vol. 53 (12) , 1085
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830120015003
Abstract
Of the many elemental management objectives of American health system reform, 3 have always stood out: control of cost, promotion of quality, and access for all to basic medical care. Many of us hoped to achieve all 3 of these major objectives in a comprehensive, organized, and timely way while preserving necessary patient and physician autonomy, promoting prevention, and emphasizing primary care, among other factors.1 Alas, such was not to be. What has happened? Cost control has been achieved in many sectors in large part because of the managed care revolution. Access has worsened. And quality is now under attack.2,3 TheJAMAEditorial Board and senior staff and the editors of theArchivesJournals have completed their annual Delphi process to identify and rank the most important topics for our journals to address in the upcoming year. Near the top was quality of care. Since quality cuts acrossKeywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Managed care: a work in progressPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1996
- Quality of Care — What is It?New England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Quality and the Medical Marketplace — Following ElephantsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- The Failure of Organized Health System Reform—Now What?Published by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1995