A novel approach for in‐process monitoring and managing cross‐contamination in a high‐throughput high‐performance liquid chromatography assay with tandem mass spectrometric detection
- 22 June 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
- Vol. 20 (14) , 2190-2200
- https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.2578
Abstract
Cross-contamination among wells of a high-throughput, high-density assay is a risk that cannot be detected or controlled by the performance of calibration standards and quality control samples. In the current practice, carryover and cross-contamination is detected only when analytes are detected in blank, zero, placebo, pre-dose samples, in a low standard or low quality control sample. There is no mechanism that allows bioanalytical scientists to determine if cross-contamination has occurred among other samples. As a result, erroneous results can be released to clients even though a batch meets the acceptance criteria. We tested a new approach that quantifies the cross-contamination of each sample and allows the scientist to make quality decisions with documentation. The approach will also detect carryover in over 90% of the wells. Briefly, two additional analytes were added as contamination markers. The markers were added to a multi-well plate alternatively creating a pattern of a checkerboard. The spiked multi-well plate was then used to perform the assay. If both markers were detected in a well, the sample was considered contaminated. The amount of the unexpected marker detected in a well measures the degree of contamination and may be used to make deactivation decisions. Depending on the relative impact of the contamination, a scientist can choose to tolerate the bias, reject the sample, reject the batch or raise the lower limit of quantitation for the batch. A guideline for rejection decisions is presented for discussion. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- A new approach for evaluating carryover and its influence on quantitation in high‐performance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry assayRapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 2006
- 96-Well solid-phase extraction: a brief history of its developmentJournal of Chromatography B, 2005
- Elimination of autosampler carryover in a bioanalytical HPLC-MS/MS method: a case studyJournal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 2004
- Automated 96-well liquid–liquid back extraction liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of ABT-202 in human plasmaJournal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 2004
- Bioanalytical method validation: a risk-based approach?Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 2004
- Trace Analysis — Challenges and ProblemsCritical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry, 2002
- Comparison of turbulent-flow chromatography with automated solid-phase extraction in 96-well plates and liquid–liquid extraction used as plasma sample preparation techniques for liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometryJournal of Chromatography A, 1999
- Adsorption of drugs in high-performance liquid chromatography injector loopsJournal of Chromatography A, 1993