Effect of Nasogastric Tube Size on Gastroesophageal Reflux and Microaspiration in Intubated Patients
- 15 June 1999
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 130 (12) , 991-994
- https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-130-12-199906150-00007
Abstract
Little evidence exists to support the theory that small-bore nasogastric tubes prevent gastroesophageal reflux and microaspiration in intubated patients. To determine whether gastroesophageal reflux and microaspiration in intubated patients can be reduced by the use of a small-bore nasogastric tube. Randomized, two-period crossover trial. Respiratory intensive care unit of a university hospital. 17 patients intubated for more than 72 hours. Radioactive technetium colloid was instilled in each patient's stomach. Patients were studied with two nasogastric tubes (one tube with a 6.0-mm external bore and one tube with a 2.85-mm external bore) in randomized order; measurements of radioactive counts with the alternate size of nasogastric tube were repeated 72 hours after original measurements were taken. Sequential samples of serum, gastric juice, and pharyngeal and tracheal secretions were obtained. Comparison of the time course of radioactive counting in all samples (obtained during the use of each nasogastric tube size in each patient). The mean radioactive count of pharyngeal aspirates (P = 0.004) was greater than the baseline count at all time points, as was the cumulative radioactive count of pharyngeal aspirates 17 hours after the first dose of technetium colloid was administered (P = 0.001); however, the count of tracheal aspirates was never greater than the count at baseline. No differences were found between tube types when the time course and cumulative counts of pharyngeal and tracheal samples were compared. Small-bore nasogastric tubes in intubated patients do not reduce gastroesophageal reflux or microaspiration.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Gastroesophageal reflux with nasogastric tubes. Effect of nasogastric tube size.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1994
- Gastric and Pharyngeal Flora in Nosocomial Pneumonia Acquired during Mechanical VentilationAmerican Review of Respiratory Disease, 1993
- Gastroesophageal Reflux in Intubated Patients Receiving Enteral Nutrition: Effect of Supine and Semirecumbent PositionsJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 1992
- A predictive risk index for nosocomial pneumonia in the intensive care unitThe American Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Gastric colonization and pneumonia in intubated critically ill patients receiving stress ulcer prophylaxisCritical Care Medicine, 1992
- Role of Gastric Colonization in the Development of Pneumonia in Critically 111 Trauma PatientsPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1991
- Large volume gastroesophageal reflux: a rationale for risk reduction in the perioperative periodCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 1988
- Nosocomial Pneumonia in Intubated Patients Given Sucralfate as Compared with Antacids or Histamine Type 2 BlockersNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Enteral nutrition in patients receiving mechanical ventilationThe American Journal of Medicine, 1986
- ASPIRATION OF GASTRIC BACTERIA IN ANTACID-TREATED PATIENTS: A FREQUENT CAUSE OF POSTOPERATIVE COLONISATION OF THE AIRWAYThe Lancet, 1982