Validity of a Symbolic Measure of Authoritarianism
- 1 October 1975
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Reports
- Vol. 37 (2) , 539-543
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1975.37.2.539
Abstract
A symbolic, non-verbal measure of authoritarianism was responded to by male and female, white and black commercial business school students, undergraduates, and graduate social work students ( N = 287). Scores on the symbolic measure showed low (.35 to .39) predictable “known groups” validity and were generally correlated as theoretically anticipated with both objectively measured and self-perceived conservatism, birth order, religious fundamentalism, subjective social-class position, and intrafamilial consistency of psychological attributes and socio-political ideologies. Given the methodological limitations of verbal authoritarianism measures, these results suggest some potential advantages of the presently reported non-verbal test of the authoritarianism dimension.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Birth order and personality.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1971
- A Symbolic Measure of Authoritarianism: An Exploratory StudyThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1970
- Reliability and Convergent Validity of a Symbolic Test for AuthoritarianismThe Journal of Psychology, 1970
- Authoritarianism among White and Black Deaf Adolescents: Two Measures ComparedPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1970
- A Symbolic Measure of Authoritarianism: A ReplicationThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1970
- A New Measure of Conservatism*British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1968
- Birth order and social behavior.Psychological Bulletin, 1966
- The F scale as a measure of breadth of perspective.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963
- Democracy and Working-Class AuthoritarianismAmerican Sociological Review, 1959