A Prospective, 1-Year Trial Using Saw Palmetto Versus Finasteride in the Treatment of Category III Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 171 (1) , 284-288
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000101487.83730.80
Abstract
This study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of saw palmetto or finasteride in men with category III prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS). A prospective, randomized, open label, 1-year study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of saw palmetto and finasteride in the treatment of men diagnosed with CP/CPPS. Patients were randomized to finasteride (5 mg once daily) or saw palmetto (325 mg daily) for 1 year. Patients were evaluated using the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index, individual domains (pain, urinary symptoms, quality of life and mean pain score) and the American Urological Association Symptom Score at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months. A total of 64 consecutive men 24 to 58 years old (mean age 43.2) with a diagnosis of CP/CPPS were equally randomized to the 2 treatment arms. All 64 men had previously received antibiotics (duration of 3 to 93 weeks), 52 (82%) had been on α-blockade. There were 61, 57 and 56 patients evaluable at 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively. At 1 year mean total National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index score decreased from 23.9 to 18.1 in the finasteride group (p <0.003), and from 24.7 to 24.6 in the saw palmetto arm (p = 0.41). In the finasteride arm the quality of life and pain domains were significantly improved at 1 year; however, urination was not. Adverse events included headache (3 cases) in the saw palmetto group and decreased libido (2 cases) in the finasteride group. At the end of the trial 13 of 32 (41%) and 21 of 32 (66%) opted to continue saw palmetto and finasteride, respectively. CP/CPPS treated with saw palmetto had no appreciable long-term improvement. In contrast, patients treated with finasteride had significant and durable improvement in all various parameters except voiding. Further studies are warranted to ascertain the mechanism and reproducibility of these effects in a placebo controlled trial.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Phytotherapy and other alternative forms of care for the patient with prostatitisCurrent Urology Reports, 2002
- Design of a multicenter randomized clinical trial for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndromeUrology, 2002
- Anti-inflammatory properties of plant flavonoids. Effects of rutin, quercetin and hesperidin on adjuvant arthritis in ratIl Farmaco, 2001
- Quercetin in men with category III chronic prostatitis: a preliminary prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trialUrology, 1999
- Effects of finasteride in patients with inflammatory chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, pilot studyUrology, 1999
- EFFECTIVE OFFICE MANAGEMENT OF CHRONIC PROSTATITISUrologic Clinics of North America, 1998
- Prostatitis: myths and realitiesUrology, 1998
- The Effect of Finasteride on the Risk of Acute Urinary Retention and the Need for Surgical Treatment among Men with Benign Prostatic HyperplasiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Effect of the lipidic lipidosterolic extract of Serenoa repens (Permixon®) on the ionophore A23187-stimulated production of leukotriene B4 (LTB4) from human polymorphonuclear neutrophilsProstaglandins, Leukotrienes & Essential Fatty Acids, 1997
- Results of Treatment with Pollen Extract (CerniltonR N) in Chronic Prostatitis and ProstatodyniaBritish Journal of Urology, 1993