Cost Utility of the Multichannel Cochlear Implant in 258 Profoundly Deaf Individuals
- 1 July 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Laryngoscope
- Vol. 106 (7) , 816-821
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-199607000-00006
Abstract
Cost utility analysis is a method of cost-effectiveness analysis which provides results in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Cost utility for the multichannel cochlear implant was calculated using Ontario Health Utilities Index data from 229 Nucleus 22-channel implant users and 32 cochlear implant candidates awaiting surgery. The health utility of the implanted group was greater than that of the candidate group by 0.204 (P<.0001). Use of this figure in a cost utility calculation indicates that cochlear implantation costs approximately $15,928 per QALY provided. Sensitivity analysis, a technique which systematically varies the assumptions underlying the calculations, suggests a range for the true value of between $12,000 and $30,000. This compares very favorably with other medical interventions. It is concluded that profound hearing loss has a significant effect on quality of life, and measurement of the changes that result from cochlear implant use indicates that this technology provides significant improvements and is quite cost-effective.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Prospective, Randomized Study of Cochlear ImplantsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Longitudinal Findings in Quality of Life and Perception of Handicap Following Cochlear ImplantationSeminars in Hearing, 1992
- Cost-effectiveness of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: Effect of improved battery life and comparison with amiodarone therapyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1992
- Psychological Change following 18 Months of Cochlear Implant UseAnnals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 1991
- Functional use of the nucleus® 22‐channel cochlear implant in the elderlyThe Laryngoscope, 1991
- Myocardial Revascularization for Chronic Stable AnginaAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1990
- Cost‐Effectiveness of Hormone ReplacementAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1990
- An analysis of the cost effectiveness of the implantable defibrillator.Circulation, 1990
- Utilities and Quality-Adjusted Life YearsInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1989