Biased Estimates of Ωmfrom Comparing Smoothed Predicted Velocity Fields to Unsmoothed Peculiar‐Velocity Measurements
- 10 July 2000
- journal article
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astrophysical Journal
- Vol. 537 (2) , 537-541
- https://doi.org/10.1086/309085
Abstract
We show that a regression of unsmoothed peculiar velocity measurements against peculiar velocities predicted from a smoothed galaxy density field leads to a biased estimate of the cosmological density parameter Omega, even when galaxies trace the underlying mass distribution and galaxy positions and velocities are known perfectly. The bias arises because the errors in the predicted velocities are correlated with the predicted velocities themselves. We investigate this bias using cosmological N-body simulations and analytic arguments. In linear perturbation theory, for cold dark matter power spectra and Gaussian or top hat smoothing filters, the bias in Omega is always positive, and its magnitude increases with increasing smoothing scale. This linear calculation reproduces the N-body results for Gaussian smoothing radii R_s > 10 Mpc/h, while non-linear effects lower the bias on smaller smoothing scales, and for R_s < 3 Mpc/h Omega is underestimated rather than overestimated. The net bias in Omega for a given smoothing filter depends on the underlying cosmological model. The effect on current estimates of Omega from velocity-velocity comparisons is probably small relative to other uncertainties, but taking full advantage of the statistical precision of future peculiar velocity data sets will require either equal smoothing of the predicted and measured velocity fields or careful accounting for the biases discussed here.Comment: 11 pages including 2 eps figures. Submitted to ApKeywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- A First Comparison of the Surface Brightness Fluctuation Survey Distances with the Galaxy Density Field: Implications for [ITAL]H[/ITAL][TINF]0[/TINF] and ΩThe Astrophysical Journal, 1999
- POTENT Reconstruction from Mark III VelocitiesThe Astrophysical Journal, 1999
- Large-scale structure in COBE-normalized cold dark matter cosmogoniesMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 1997
- Comparison of Velocity and Gravity Fields: The Mark III Tully‐Fisher Catalog versus theIRAS1.2 Jy SurveyThe Astrophysical Journal, 1996
- Ω and biasing from optical galaxies versus POTENT massMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 1995
- IRAS galaxies versus POTENT mass - Density fields, biasing, and OmegaThe Astrophysical Journal, 1993
- COBE background radiation anisotropies and large-scale structure in the UniverseMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 1992
- The large-scale distribution of IRAS galaxies and the predicted peculiar velocity fieldMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 1991
- Recovering the full velocity and density fields from large-scale redshift-distance samplesThe Astrophysical Journal, 1989
- The Large-Scale Structure of the UniversePublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1981