Rational Use of New and Existing Disease-Modifying Agents in Rheumatoid Arthritis
- 17 April 2001
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 134 (8) , 695-706
- https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-134-8-200104170-00013
Abstract
Because of radiographic evidence of progressive bone loss and the inability to eliminate synovial proliferation with methotrexate, it became apparent that therapy for rheumatoid arthritis needed further advancement. Methotrexate is not a remission-inducing drug and may have dose-limiting toxicity. In the past 2 years, three new disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have been approved: leflunomide, etanercept, and infliximab. Each of these agents has demonstrated efficacy compared with placebo in randomized, controlled studies. Because methotrexate had a dominant therapeutic role, the new drugs were also studied in combination with it. Other established DMARDs, such as sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine, have also demonstrated efficacy when used together with methotrexate. The results of these combination studies clearly demonstrate that clinical responses can be meaningfully improved when new and existing DMARDs are added to methotrexate. Although toxicity remains a serious concern when powerful immune modulators and antimetabolites are used in combination, relatively few serious adverse events have been reported during 2-year treatment periods. It has also become apparent that combinations of new DMARDs and methotrexate virtually halt radiographic progression over 2 years. The new agents are expensive, but annual costs must be weighed against the personal and societal expense of joint arthroplasty, hospitalizations, disability, and diminished quality of life that accompanies poorly controlled rheumatoid arthritis. The ultimate value of combination DMARD therapy with methotrexate will be determined by long-term data on safety, efficacy, and effects on radiographic deterioration of bone. Additional long-term observational data on the incidence of joint arthroplasty and disability will help to place the issue of societal costs in a better perspective. This will allow the value of aggressive treatment to be established with certainty.Keywords
This publication has 60 references indexed in Scilit:
- Treatment of Active Rheumatoid Arthritis With Leflunomide Compared With Placebo and MethotrexateArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1999
- Treatment of early seropositive rheumatoid arthritis with minocycline: Four-year followup of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trialArthritis & Rheumatism, 1999
- Pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of combination treatment with methotrexate and leflunomide in patients with active rheumatoid arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1999
- Radiographic outcome of recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis: A 19-year study of radiographic progressionArthritis & Rheumatism, 1998
- Therapeutic efficacy of multiple intravenous infusions of anti-tumor necrosis factor ? monoclonal antibody combined with low-dose weekly methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1998
- The long-term outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis: A 23-year prospective, longitudinal study of total joint replacement and its predictors in 1,600 patients with rheumatoid arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1998
- Increased Plasma Concentrations for Type I and II Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptors and IL-2 Receptors in Cancer PatientsTumor Biology, 1994
- The safety and efficacy of the use of methotrexate in long‐term therapy for rheumatoid arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1986
- Comparison of low‐dose oral pulse methotrexate and placebo in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. A Controlled Clinical TrialArthritis & Rheumatism, 1985
- Severe functional declines, work disability, and increased mortality in seventy‐five rheumatoid arthritis patients studied over nine yearsArthritis & Rheumatism, 1984