Breast Screening: Adverse Psychological Consequences One Month after Placing Women on Early Recall Because of a Diagnostic Uncertainty. A Multicentre Study
- 1 September 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Medical Screening
- Vol. 4 (3) , 158-168
- https://doi.org/10.1177/096914139700400309
Abstract
Background—: It was the original intention of the UK National Health Service Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) to place women who were not diagnosed with cancer on three yearly routine recall (RR). In 1994–5 approximately 16 500 women, aged SO to 64, were placed on early recall (ER) at a shorter time interval, of which about 98% will have a normal result. This large number exceeds the expectations of the NHSBSP. Objective—: To establish the adverse psychological consequences (PCs) for women one month after placement on ER because of a diagnostic uncertainty, and if detected, to suggest practical solutions to reduce them. Methods—: Thirteen breast screening centres throughout the UK participated in the study. From March to October 199S all women who were placed on ER because of a diagnostic uncertainty were identified and compared with groups of women placed on RR (after mammography, assessment, fine needle aspiration, and a benign biopsy). These women were invited to complete a postal questionnaire one month after they were placed on ER or RR. One reminder was sent. Results—: Overall 75% of women completed the questionnaire. The adverse PCs of placing women on ER because of a diagnostic uncertainty were higher (63%; n=81 of 130) than those of women placed on RR after mammography (29%; n=38 of 130) (P<0.00001) or assessment (50%; n=64 of 128)(Plt;0.05), but lower than the adverse PCs of women who underwent a benign biopsy (87%; n=26 of 30)(P<0.05). Factors that were significantly associated with subsequent adverse PCs were identified. Conclusions—: The adverse PCs of being placed on ER because of a diagnostic uncertainty were significantly higher than those of women who turned out to have a false-positive mammographic result after assessment. Possible practical solutions are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of the written information sent to women who are called back for further investigation of breast screening in the UKHealth Education Journal, 1996
- How distressing is attendance for routine breast screening?Psycho‐Oncology, 1994
- When good news is bad news: Medical wellness as a nonevent in undergraduates.Health Psychology, 1994
- A qualitative evaluation of the experience of surgery after false positive results in screening for familial ovarian cancerPsycho‐Oncology, 1992
- The development of a six‐item short‐form of the state scale of the Spielberger State—Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1992
- Asymmetry of doubt in medical self-diagnosis: The ambiguity of "uncertain wellness."Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1991
- Anxiety caused by abnormal result of cervical smear test: a controlled trial.BMJ, 1990
- PENSIVE WOMEN, PAINFUL VIGILS: CONSEQUENCES OF DELAY IN ASSESSMENT OF MAMMOGRAPHIC ABNORMALITIESThe Lancet, 1988
- A Technique for Developing Suppression TestsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1952
- Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of testsPsychometrika, 1951