The Merits of Mixing Methods in Evaluation
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2001
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation
- Vol. 7 (1) , 25-44
- https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890122209504
Abstract
Evaluators are challenged to understand human behavior in all of its natural complexity and individuality. Our work is conducted in natural settings, where history and context matter, where human behavior traces complex patterns of influence and relationship, where what is meaningful to those in the setting is both phenomenological and structural, arising from both lived experiences and the societal institutions that frame and shape those experiences. Engaging this complexity requires not a privileging of just one way of knowing and valuing, but rather a marshalling of all of our ways of understanding in a framework that honors diversity and respects difference. This framework is advanced in this article as a mixed-method way of thinking. A presentation of key concepts in the framework is followed by case examples from the US.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Conceptual Issues and Analytic Strategies in Mixed-Method Studies of Preschool InclusionJournal of Early Intervention, 2000
- Values in Evaluation and Social ResearchPublished by SAGE Publications ,1999
- Evaluation as advocacyEvaluation Practice, 1997
- Sustaining vs. resolving the quantitative-qualitative debateEvaluation and Program Planning, 1995
- Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation DesignsEducational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1989
- Improving inferences from multiple methodsNew Directions for Program Evaluation, 1987
- Evaluating With SenseEvaluation Review, 1983
- The Ecology of Human DevelopmentPublished by Harvard University Press ,1979