Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison of Intravenous Amiodarone and Bretylium in the Treatment of Patients With Recurrent, Hemodynamically Destabilizing Ventricular Tachycardia or Fibrillation
- 1 December 1995
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 92 (11) , 3255-3263
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.92.11.3255
Abstract
Background After several days of loading, oral amiodarone, a class III antiarrhythmic, is highly effective in controlling ventricular tachyarrhythmias; however, the delay in onset of activity is not acceptable in patients with immediately life-threatening arrhythmias. Therefore, an intravenous form of therapy is advantageous. This study was designed to compare the safety and efficacy of a high and a low dose of intravenous amiodarone with bretylium, the only approved class III antiarrhythmic agent. Methods and Results A total of 302 patients with refractory, hemodynamically destabilizing ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation were enrolled in this double-blind trial at 82 medical centers in the United States. They were randomly assigned to therapy with intravenous bretylium (4.7 g) or intravenous amiodarone administered in a high dose (1.8 g) or a low dose (0.2 g). The primary analysis, arrhythmia event rate during the first 48 hours of therapy, showed comparable efficacy between the bretylium group and the high-dose (1000 mg/24 h) amiodarone group that was greater than that of the low-dose (125 mg/24 h) amiodarone group. Similar results were obtained in the secondary analyses of time to first event and the proportion of patients requiring supplemental infusions. Overall mortality in the 48-hour double-blind period was 13.6% and was not significantly different among the three treatment groups. Significantly more patients treated with bretylium had hypotension compared with the two amiodarone groups. More patients remained on the 1000-mg amiodarone regimen than on the other regimens. Conclusions Bretylium and amiodarone appear to have comparable efficacies for the treatment of highly malignant ventricular arrhythmias. Bretylium use, however, may be limited by a high incidence of hypotension.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hemodynamic effects and tolerability of intravenous amiodarone in patients with impaired left ventricular functionAmerican Heart Journal, 1991
- Efficacy of intravenous amiodarone as short-term treatment for refractory ventricular tachycardiaAmerican Heart Journal, 1988
- AmiodaroneNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Electrophysiologic effects and mechanisms of termination of supraventricular tachycardia by intravenous amiodaroneAmerican Heart Journal, 1984
- Evaluation of amiodarone therapy in the treatment of drug-resistant cardiac arrhythmias: Long-term follow-upAmerican Heart Journal, 1983
- Control of sudden recurrent arrhythmic deaths: Role of amiodaroneAmerican Heart Journal, 1983
- Survival after Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the HospitalNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Lidocaine in prehospital countershock refractory ventricular fibrillationAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1981
- BretyliumNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979
- Approaches to Sudden Death from Coronary Heart DiseaseCirculation, 1971