Validity of synthetic estimates of problem-drinker prevalence.
- 1 September 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Public Health Association in American Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 71 (9) , 1016-1020
- https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.71.9.1016
Abstract
For the purpose of evaluating their validity, survey-based synthetic estimates of problem-drinker prevalence in California's counties were correlated with social indicators of alcohol abuse. Prevalence estimates were predictive of automobile accidents and drunk-driving arrests but not of other problems. Data on drinking practices from a statewide survey provide more valid estimates than national survey data. Taking into account empirical and other factors impinging upon the validity of this prevalence formula, it is concluded that synthetic estimates provide a defensible but limited basis for estimating needs for alcoholism services in small areas.This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Alcohol-related mortality and alcohol consumption statistics: stability of estimates for small areas.Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 1981
- Problems of epidemiology in alcohol problems.Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 1975
- Some Factors Affecting the Geographic Comparison of Alcoholism Prevalence Rates. Implications for the Use of the Jellinek Estimation FormulaQuarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 1961
- Estimating the Prevalence of Alcoholism: A Critical Analysis of the Jellinek FormulaQuarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 1959
- Estimating the Prevalence of Alcoholism: Toward a Modification of the Jellinek FormulaQuarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 1959
- Estimating the Prevalence of Alcoholism: Modified Values in the Jellinek Formula and an Alternative ApproachQuarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 1959
- The Jellinek Alcoholism Estimation Formula and its Application to Canadian DataQuarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 1956