Whither the Foreskin?
- 14 September 1970
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA)
- Vol. 213 (11) , 1853-1858
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1970.03170370037006
Abstract
Routine neonatal circumcision has been advocated as a means of preventing genitourinary diseases and genital cancers. However, the procedure has been found to be of questionable benefit and to be associated with both immediate and delayed risks and complications. These in turn may produce undesirable psychologic, sexual, and medico-legal difficulties. Circumcision is considered with respect to carcinoma of the cervix, penis, and prostate; there is little evidence that circumcision of the newborn affords protection against subsequent development of these cancers in individuals who practice good personal hygiene.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Psychologic developmentPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2004
- Carcinoma of PenisJournal of Urology, 1995
- Ritualistic Surgery — Circumcision and TonsillectomyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1969
- Psychological effects of circumcision*Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 1965
- The Rape of the PhallusPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1965
- Circumcision and Cancer of the CervixBritish Journal of Cancer, 1965
- Surgical Complications of CircumcisionArchives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 1964
- ON THE PREVENTION OF CARCINOMA OF THE CERVIXThe Lancet, 1964
- Routine CircumcisionAmerican Journal of Diseases of Children, 1963
- Contribution to the study of the etiology and prevention of cancer of the cervix of the uterusAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1950