After Authenticity at an American Heritage Site
- 1 September 1996
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in American Anthropologist
- Vol. 98 (3) , 568-578
- https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1996.98.3.02a00100
Abstract
S: This essay explores what happens to a heritage site “after authenticity.” The site is Colonial Williamsburg, one of the most ambitious reconstruction projects ever undertaken and a place intended to be experienced as an objective correlate of an American national “identity.” Because it makes such claims, throughout its history the site has been subject to critiques by those wishing to undermine its authority to speak as the voice of an all‐encompassing America. Moreover, in the past 20 years, professional historians at Colonial Williamsburg have become articulate on‐site critics of the epistemology of authenticity as they promulgate a historiography currently popular in history museums and in the academy.This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Abraham Lincoln as Authentic Reproduction: A Critique of PostmodernismAmerican Anthropologist, 1994
- The Authority of Documents at Some American History MuseumsJournal of American History, 1994
- The Authentic Interior: QuestingGemeinschaftin Post-Industrial SocietyHuman Organization, 1994
- Wonder and Worth: Disney Museums in World ShowcaseMuseum Anthropology, 1993
- Colonialist Anthropology at Colonial WilliamsburgMuseum Anthropology, 1993
- Introduction: Thinking about ThingsMuseum Anthropology, 1992
- Social Responsibility and the American History MuseumWinterthur Portfolio, 1989
- Weavers and dealers: the authenticity of an oriental carpetPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1986
- AuthenticityAnthropology Today, 1986
- Visiting the Past: History Museums in the United StatesRadical History Review, 1981