Interference Phase
- 2 September 1974
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review Letters
- Vol. 33 (10) , 610-613
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.33.610
Abstract
The phase difference observed in is compared with the phase from a Regge fit to the data for and the phase given by a Reggeized Deck model. The agreement (∼30°) depends crucially on the contribution of the Reggeized pion propagator to the phase and requires equal signs for the and residues in the amplitude.
Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Partial-Wave Analysis of the Deck Amplitude forπN→πππNPhysical Review D, 1973
- The decay channel A2− → ηπ− in the reaction π−p → pπ−π+π−π° at 40 GeV/cNuclear Physics B, 1973
- A1, A2 and A3 production in π−p→π−π−π+p at 25 and 40 GeV/cNuclear Physics B, 1973
- KS0K−Decay ofA2−Produced by 20.3 -GeV/cπ−on HydrogenPhysical Review D, 1972
- Comments on A2 productionPhysics Letters B, 1971
- Measurement of the A−2 meson mass spectrumPhysics Letters B, 1971
- Difference in Energy Dependence forandProductionPhysical Review Letters, 1970
- Partial-Wave Analysis of theDecay of thePhysical Review Letters, 1970
- ReggeizedπρMass Enhancement in theA1RegionPhysical Review B, 1968
- Ao2 production in π+d interactionPhysics Letters B, 1967