Interpreting WISC-R Profiles: Reliability of Subtest Composites
- 1 September 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
- Vol. 2 (3) , 183-190
- https://doi.org/10.1177/073428298400200302
Abstract
The reliability of subtest composites corresponding to the abilities and influences included in Kaufman's (1979) system for interpreting Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised profiles was examined at 6½, 11½ and 16½ years of age. These composites were found to consistently demonstrate high reliability. Increasing reliability was generally related to the number of subtests in a composite and to the proportion of Verbal to Performance subtests in a composite. The reliability of certain composites also fluctuated as a result of age. The implications of these findings for the practitioner interpreting a Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised profile are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of the WISC-R Patterns of Children of Average and Exceptional AbilityPsychological Reports, 1983
- The value of WISC-R profile analysis for the differential diagnosis of learning disabled childrenJournal of Clinical Psychology, 1982
- WISC-R: The first five yearsPsychology in the Schools, 1980
- III. WISC-R scatter indices: Useful information for differential diagnosis?Journal of School Psychology, 1980
- Factor analysis of the WISC-R at 11 age levels between 61/2 and 161/2 years.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1975