Binomial Sex-Ratio Distribution in the Lesser Snow Goose: A Theoretical Enigma
- 1 January 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by University of Chicago Press in The American Naturalist
- Vol. 121 (1) , 1-8
- https://doi.org/10.1086/284036
Abstract
Several social and/or ecological conditions can be recognized that would make a strict adherence to an independent (random) sex-determination mechanism, if not maladaptive, certainly nonadaptive. Some conditions should lead to parental control over sex determination being adaptive; in others it can be reasonably argued that no 1 sex-determining mechanism should be favored. The population structure, methods of mate choice and breeding biology of the lesser snow goose are such that theory would predict a virtual absence of selective pressure maintaining an independent sex-determination mechanism. Such a situation should lead to more variance in the distribution of intraclutch sex ratios than predicted by the binomial model of independent sex determination. A large sample of goslings does show a sex-ratio distribution which closely fits the binomial, thus refuting the theoretical argument. Pleiotropic effects of sex-skew mutations place a selective disadvantage on such mutations or that such mutations are, for one reason or another, impossible.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Resource competition and social conflict in experimental populations of yeastNature, 2006
- Local mate competition and the sex ratioJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1980
- Sex ratio under the haystack modelJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1980
- Sex-Ratio Adjustment in the Common GrackleScience, 1977
- An Explanation of Egg-Weight Variation in the Lesser Snow GooseThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 1976
- The Mechanism of Natural Selection for the Sex RatioThe American Naturalist, 1960