The autopsy: complete or not complete?
- 25 April 2003
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Histopathology
- Vol. 42 (5) , 417-423
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2559.2003.01596.x
Abstract
Less invasive or non-invasive alternatives to the complete autopsy have been sought for some time, and a range of methods, ranging from needle sampling to endoscopy to magnetic resonance imaging, have been considered. Evaluations of these methods are few and far between, but generally confirm the predictable conclusion that incomplete autopsies provide incomplete information. It is not difficult to envisage a situation whereby pressure for non-invasive autopsies will allow them to become prevalent, whether properly evaluated or not. However, used appropriately, non-invasive or less invasive autopsies may be valuable tools capable of answering specific questions in situations where it is not possible to perform a complete autopsy.Keywords
This publication has 68 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laparoscopic autopsiesSurgical Endoscopy, 2001
- Practice guidelines for necropsy: time for action.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1996
- Cytodiagnosis and the necropsy.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1995
- HIV and the necropsy.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1993
- Sudden fatal or non-operable bleeding from ruptured intracranial aneurysm Evaluation by post-mortem angiography with vulcanising contrast mediumInternational journal of legal medicine, 1993
- MR‐based hippocampal volumetry in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's diseaseNeurology, 1992
- Post mortem radiology in children with congenital heart disease.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1988
- The Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and the autopsyJAMA, 1984
- The Autopsy: Its Decline and a Suggestion for Its RevivalNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- Needle NecropsyJournal of Clinical Pathology, 1955