The effect of skill level, external frame of reference and environmental changes on one-handed catching
- 1 November 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Ergonomics
- Vol. 31 (11) , 1655-1663
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00140138808966815
Abstract
Two groups of subjects designated ‘good’ (n= 12) and ‘poor’ (n= 10) catchers on the basis of a task-specific criterion were required to catch, one-handed, balls projected from a ball-projection machine under eight different conditions. Four of these comprised the ‘environment illuminated’ conditions (full light; hand obscured by an opaque screen; a see-through screen and an external vertical reference frame in the field of view) and four others the ‘environment dark’ conditions (catching hand wearing a glove painted with luminescent paint and u. v. illuminated ball in an otherwise dark room; ball illuminated by u. v. light; luminescent hand and external luminescent vertical reference plus u. v. illuminated ball; u. v.-illuminated ball, plus luminescent vertical reference). While clear and significant differences - as was to be expected from the selection criteria imposed - were shown between the groups of ‘good’ and ‘poor’ catchers for all three dependent variables-number of catches, spatial errors and temporal errors-it was demonstrated that, for both groups, degrading the environment, by reducing the information available, resulted in a significant performance decrement on the dependent variables ‘number of catches’ and ‘temporal errors’. ‘Poor’ catchers were also shown to make significantly more spatial errors than ‘good’ catchers. Whereas the latter finding confirms earlier findings reported in the literature, the significant effect on performance of degrading the environment -particularly with respect to temporal errors - is new. The finding is discussed in the framework of the use of ‘tau’ (time to contact) in making judgements about when to initiate the grasp response.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Catch as Catch CanPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1987
- Skill Level and Efficacy of Effector Visual Feedback in Ball CatchingPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1987
- Isn’t There a Catch in It Somewhere?Journal of Motor Behavior, 1986
- Skill Level, Vision, and Proprioception in Simple One-Hand CatchingJournal of Motor Behavior, 1985
- Visual Timing in Hitting An Accelerating BallThe Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 1983
- Vision and Proprioception in Simple CatchingJournal of Motor Behavior, 1982
- Optical insignificance of the nose and the pinocchio effect in free-scan visual straight-ahead judgmentsPerception & Psychophysics, 1976
- Exposure and Occluded Duration Effects in a Ball-Catching SkillJournal of Motor Behavior, 1974
- Visual Occlusion Factors in a Discrete Ball-Catching TaskJournal of Motor Behavior, 1974
- Critical Time Intervals for Taking in Flight Information in a Ball-Catching TaskErgonomics, 1970