Population-Based Outreach for Chlamydia Screening in Men: Results From a Randomized Trial
- 1 November 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Sexually Transmitted Diseases
- Vol. 34 (11) , 837-839
- https://doi.org/10.1097/olq.0b013e31805ba860
Abstract
To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of population-based outreach strategies to improve genital Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) screening in men.In a randomized trial, male enrollees ages 21-25 (n = 8820) were selected from the automated files of Group Health Cooperative and randomized to: a letter + test-request card for a CT urine home sampling kit (arm 1, n = 2940); a letter + mail-back sampling kit (arm 2, n = 2940); or a usual care control (arm 3, n = 2940). One reminder was sent to arms 1 and 2. The outcome was CT testing rates in the 4 months postrandomization.105 of 2940 (3.6%) men in arm 1 and 230 of 2940 (7.8%) in arm 2 returned mailed specimens. All 335 respondents were sexually experienced, 43% had >2 sex partners in the past year, and 80% reported no genitourinary symptoms. Compared to arm 3, the relative risk of being tested was 5.6 (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.6-8.7) for arm 1 and 11.1 (95% CI 7.3-16.9) for arm 2. Arm 2 was significantly more likely to be tested than arm 1. CT prevalence for mailed-back specimens was 1.0% (1 of 105) for arm 1 and 2.6% (6 of 230) for arm 2; 70% of all positive intervention tests were from mailed samples.Both strategies resulted in significantly higher CT testing than usual care, but the intervention response rate was low (5.7% overall). Direct kit mailing performed best. In US populations, the value of mailed outreach strategies to men must be considered in the context of other CT screening priorities.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Acceptability of Urine-Based Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis to Asymptomatic Young Men and Their ProvidersSexually Transmitted Diseases, 2007
- Acceptability and Consequences of Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis by Home-Based Urine TestingSexually Transmitted Diseases, 2005
- Prevalence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis increases significantly with level of urbanisation and suggests targeted screening approaches: results from the first national population based study in the NetherlandsSexually Transmitted Infections, 2005
- Testing for Chlamydial and Gonorrheal Infections Outside of Clinic SettingsSexually Transmitted Diseases, 2004
- Population-Based Study of Chlamydial Infection in ChinaJAMA, 2003
- Population‐Based Strategies for Outreach Screening of UrogenitalChlamydia trachomatisInfections: A Randomized, Controlled TrialThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2002
- The prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in male undergraduates: a postal surveySexually Transmitted Infections, 2001
- Home Sampling versus Conventional Swab Sampling for Screening ofChlamydia trachomatisin Women: A Cluster‐Randomized 1‐Year Follow‐up StudyClinical Infectious Diseases, 2000
- Low diagnostic accuracy of selective screening criteria for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infections in the general populationSexually Transmitted Infections, 2000
- Home screening for chlamydial genital infection: is it acceptable to young men and women?Sexually Transmitted Infections, 2000