Bad Jobs in Britain
Top Cited Papers
- 1 May 2004
- journal article
- other
- Published by SAGE Publications in Work and Occupations
- Vol. 31 (2) , 225-249
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888404263900
Abstract
The rapid growth in nonstandard forms of employment toward the end of the 20th century has fuelled claims about the spread of “bad jobs” within Anglo-American capitalism. Research from the United States indicates that such jobs have more bad characteristics than do permanent jobs after controlling for workers’ personal characteristics, family status, and occupation. We apply a version of the bad characteristics approach to British data and find that despite some institutional differences with the United States, (notably, in employer welfare provision), the British case also supports the hypothesis that nonstandard employment (part-time, temporary, and fixed term) increases workers’ exposure to bad job characteristics.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Effects of Working Time, Segmentation and Labour Market Mobility on Wages and Pensions in IrelandBritish Journal of Industrial Relations, 2003
- Symposium on Temporary Work: IntroductionThe Economic Journal, 2002
- Temporary Jobs: Stepping Stones or Dead Ends?The Economic Journal, 2002
- Between Flexibility and Regulation: Rights, Equality and Protection at WorkBritish Journal of Industrial Relations, 2001
- What Determines Job Quality in Nursing Homes?ILR Review, 2000
- Bad Jobs in America: Standard and Nonstandard Employment Relations and Job Quality in the United StatesAmerican Sociological Review, 2000
- The Changing Practices of WorkPublished by Springer Nature ,1997
- TOWARD AN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR OF CONTRACT LABORERS: THEIR PSYCHOLOGICAL INVOLVEMENT AND EFFECTS ON EMPLOYEE CO-WORKERS.The Academy of Management Journal, 1993
- Sex Segregation in the WorkplaceAnnual Review of Sociology, 1993
- The `Flexible Firm': Fixation or Fact?Work, Employment & Society, 1988