Production Relations, Labor Productivity, and Choice of Technique: British and U.S. Cotton Spinning
- 1 September 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Journal of Economic History
- Vol. 41 (3) , 491-516
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022050700044302
Abstract
The role of capital-labor relations in the transformation of inputs into output is central to the Marxian theory of capitalist development but is neglected by neoclassical theory. By comparing the development of cotton spinning in Britain and the U.S. in the last half of the nineteenth century, this paper analyzes the ways in which capital-labor relations affected the level and structure of wages, labor productivity, and choice of technique. This case study demonstrates the descriptive and predictive limitations of the neoclassical theory of choice of technique while at the same time pointing the way towards the development of a more incisive, and historically relevant, theory.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Factor Costs and the Diffusion of Ring Spinning in Britain Prior to World War IThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1981
- Skilled labour and the choice of technique in Edwardian industryExplorations in Economic History, 1974
- What Do Bosses Do?Review of Radical Political Economics, 1974
- INDUSTRIAL PEACE IN THE COTTON TRADE 1875?1913Bulletin of Economic Research, 1967
- The Economic Implications of Learning by DoingThe Review of Economic Studies, 1962
- Pepperell’s ProgressPublished by Harvard University Press ,1948
- The Growth of Textile Businesses in the Oldham District, 1884-1924Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1926
- Some Policies of the Cotton Spinners' Trade UnionsThe Economic Journal, 1900
- On the Rate of Wages in Manchester and Salford, and the Manufacturing Districts of Lancashire, 1839-59Journal of the Statistical Society of London, 1860