Reassessment of treadmill stress testing for risk stratification in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated by thrombolysis.
Open Access
- 1 November 1993
- Vol. 70 (5) , 415-420
- https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.70.5.415
Abstract
OBJECTIVES--To evaluate the role of a treadmill stress test for identifying patients at risk of recurrent ischaemic events after acute myocardial infarction treated by thrombolysis. BACKGROUND--The natural history of myocardial infarction has changed with the introduction of thrombolytic treatment; there is a lower mortality but a higher incidence of recurrent thrombotic events (reinfarction, unstable angina). The treadmill stress continues to be recommended for risk stratification after acute myocardial infarction even though its value has never been formally reassessed in the thrombolytic era. METHODS--Prospective observational study in which 256 consecutive patients who presented with acute myocardial infarction treated by thrombolysis underwent an early treadmill stress test and were followed up for 10 (range 6-12) months. RESULTS--Recurrent ischaemic events occurred in 41 patients (unstable angina 15, reinfarction 21, death five) and a further 21 required revascularisation. Both ST depression at a low workload and low exercise tolerance (< 7 metabolic equivalents of the task (METS) were predictive of recurrent events, with respective hazard ratios of 1.93 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.17-3.20; p < 0.01)) and 1.67 (95% CI 1.0-2.78; p < 0.05). These variables identified 50% and 70% of patients who subsequently sustained a recurrent ischaemic event, but the corresponding values for positive predictive accuracy were only 26% and 21%. Thus they are of limited value as a screening measure for identifying patients likely to benefit from invasive investigation and revascularisation. None of the other variables (ST elevation, haemodynamic responses, ventricular extrasystoles, angina) was significantly associated with recurrent ischaemic events. CONCLUSIONS--The treadmill stress test is of limited value for identifying patients at risk of recurrent ischaemic events after acute myocardial infarction treated by thrombolysis.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ethical issues debated by BMA.1985
- Exercise stress testing in the post-myocardial infarction patientThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1983
- Can noninvasive exercise test criteria identify patients with left main or 3-vessel coronary disease after a first myocardial infarction?The American Journal of Cardiology, 1983
- Prognostic value of exercise testing, coronary angiography and left ventriculography 6--8 weeks after myocardial infarction.Circulation, 1982
- Early Post-myocardial Infarction Treadmill Stress TestingAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1981
- Exercise testing early after myocardial infarction: Predictive value for subsequent unstable angina and deathThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1980
- Exercise-induced ST segment elevation. Electrocardiographic, angiographic, and scintigraphic evaluation.Heart, 1980
- Prognostic Value of Exercise Testing Soon after Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979
- Exercise Testing Three Weeks after Myocardial InfarctionChest, 1979
- Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration.1966