Candidate Image Attributes
- 1 August 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Communication Research
- Vol. 26 (4) , 414-428
- https://doi.org/10.1177/009365099026004003
Abstract
This study examined the role of attribute salience in the agenda setting process. Two experiments were conducted to investigate how media emphasis on certain political candidate attributes would influence public perceptions of those politicians. Specifically, media portrayals of candidate personality and qualification traits were explored. Findings suggest that people's impressions of candidate personality traits mirror media portrayals of those traits. However, media portrayals of personality traits do not affect a candidate's overall salience. The data also indicate that candidate qualifications do influence affective perceptions of politicians. Finally, the authors consider the ramifications of these results on future scholarship.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- News That MattersPublished by University of Chicago Press ,2010
- Two Levels of Agenda Setting Among Advertising and News in the 1995 Spanish ElectionsPolitical Communication, 1998
- Candidate Images in Spanish Elections: Second-Level Agenda-Setting EffectsJournalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 1997
- The Evolution of Agenda-Setting Research: Twenty-Five Years in the Marketplace of IdeasJournal of Communication, 1993
- The Effects of Dominant Photographs: An Agenda-Setting ExperimentJournalism Quarterly, 1988
- Experimental Demonstrations of the “Not-So-Minimal” Consequences of Television News ProgramsAmerican Political Science Review, 1982
- The Issues of the Sixties: An Exploratory Study in the Dynamics of Public OpinionPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1973
- Personal Qualities in Presidential Images: The Contribution of the PressMidwest Journal of Political Science, 1972
- The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass MediaPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1972
- Effect of Partisanship on the Perception of Political CandidatesPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1964