The prognosis for patients with new-onset angina who have undergone cardiac catheterization.
- 1 November 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 68 (5) , 970-978
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.68.5.970
Abstract
The prognostic significance of new-onset angina was investigated in patients in whom coronary anatomic characteristics were known. New onset angina was defined as angina of less than 3 mo. duration. Consecutive patients (n = 1727) with significant coronary artery disease (diagnosed at cardiac catheterization) and who had not had a prior myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure were studied. In patients with new-onset angina (n = 329) there were a higher incidence of single-vessel disease (43% vs. 27%) and a lower incidence of triple-vessel (23% vs. 35%) and left main artery (5% vs. 10%) diseased compared with patients with chronic angina (n = 1398). Patients were classiifed by the presence or absence of preinfarction angina (severe and prolonged angina at rest requiring hospitalization to rule out myocardial infarction). In patients treated without surgery and who did not have preinfarction angina, survival at 1 yr was 97% for patients with new-onset angina and 98% for those with chronic angina (P = 0.27). Among patients not treated surgically who did not have preinfarction angina, at 1 yr 16% with new-onset angina and 7% with chronic angina had suffered a cardiac event (nonfatal myocardial infarction or death, P = 0.006). In patients treated surgically who did not have preinfarction angina, survival at 1 yr was 96% both for those with new-onset angina and those with chronic angina (P = 0.99). The risk of an event in patients treated surgically at 1 yr was not statistically different in patients with new-onset angina and those with chronic angina (12% vs. 11%, P = 0.27). Survival and event-free rates were lower in patients with preinfarction angina than in patients who did not have it. The nonsurgically and surgically treated patients with new-onset preinfarction angina remained at higher risk of an event than patients with preinfarction angina and a history of chronic angina. In patients who underwent cardiac catheterization there were no significant differences in survival rates between those with new-onset angina and those with chronic angina. However, patients with new-onset angina were at increased risk of a cardiac event, despite less severe anatomic disease.This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are clinical trials in coronary heart disease oversold or undersold?Circulation, 1981
- Unstable angina pectoris of new onset: A prospective clinical and arteriographic study of 75 patientsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1981
- Nonfatal myocardial infarction in medically treated patients with coronary artery diseaseThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1980
- Unstable angina pectoris: National cooperative study group to compare surgical and medical therapy: II. In-Hospital experience and initial follow-up results in patients with one, two and three vessel diseaseThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1978
- Coronary anatomy and arteriography in patients with unstable angina pectorisThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1978
- Unstable angina pectoris: National cooperative study group to compare medical and surgical therapy: I. Report of protocol and patient populationThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1976
- Letter: Prognosis of new and worsening angina pectoris.BMJ, 1976
- Prodromata in Acute Myocardial InfarctionCirculation, 1969
- Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survivalJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1958