The Flexibility Debate: Industrial Relations and New Management Production Practices
- 1 June 1988
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Labour and Industry
- Vol. 1 (2) , 187-209
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10301763.1988.10669041
Abstract
There is increasing interest in Australia and overseas about the implications of the changing product market and technological environment for the skills and responsibilities of the shopfloor workforce in manufacturing industry. Broadly, there are two approaches. The first, based on Piore and Sabel's work (1984), suggests that the advent of niche-based product market strategies and small-batch production will herald a new era of enriched work roles and employee involvement practices. The second approach, based on a more pessimistic interpretation of changing management practices, stresses the possible intensified managerial control and employment losses associated with the new environment. Making use of a series of seven case studies of metal industry plants in Victoria and NSW, this study investigates these different approaches and concludes that the latter framework offers a more realistic interpretation.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Managing through the Recession: An Analysis of Employee Relations in the Australian Engineering IndustryLabour and Industry, 1987
- The Red Rose of NissanCapital & Class, 1987
- New developments in manufacturing: the just-in-time systemCapital & Class, 1986
- The Work Process Under More Flexible ProductionIndustrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 1986
- Perspectives on Lobor Market FlexibilityIndustrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 1986
- Industrial Relations & Industrial Adjustment in the Car IndustryIndustrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 1985
- Work and PoliticsPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1982