Comparison of Screening Mammography in the United States and the United Kingdom
Top Cited Papers
- 22 October 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 290 (16) , 2129-2137
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.16.2129
Abstract
Research from JAMA — Comparison of Screening Mammography in the United States and the United Kingdom — ContextScreening mammography differs between the United States and the United Kingdom; a direct comparison may suggest methods to improve the practice.ObjectiveTo compare screening mammography performance between the United States and the United Kingdom among similar-aged women.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsWomen aged 50 years or older were identified who underwent 5.5 million mammograms from January 1, 1996, to December 31, 1999, within 3 large-scale mammography registries or screening programs: the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC, n = 978 591) and National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP, n = 613 388) in the United States; and the National Health Service Breast Screening Program (NHSBSP, n = 3.94 million) in the United Kingdom. A total of 27 612 women were diagnosed with breast cancer (invasive or ductal carcinoma in situ) within 12 months of screening among the 3 groups.Main Outcome MeasuresRecall rates (recommendation for further evaluation including diagnostic imaging, ultrasound, clinical examination, or biopsy) and cancer detection rates were calculated for first and subsequent mammograms, and within 5-year age groups.ResultsRecall rates were approximately twice as high in the United States than in the United Kingdom for all age groups; however, cancer rates were similar. Among women aged 50 to 54 years who underwent a first screening mammogram, 14.4% in the BCSC and 12.5% in the NBCCEDP were recalled for further evaluation vs only 7.6% in the NHSBSP. Cancer detection rates per 1000 mammogram screens were 5.8, 5.9, and 6.3, in the BCSC, NBCCEDP, and NHSBSP, respectively. Recall rates were lower for subsequent examinations in all 3 settings but remained twice as high in the United States. A similar percentage of women underwent biopsy in each setting, but rates of percutaneous biopsy were lower and open surgical biopsy higher in the United States. Open surgical biopsies not resulting in a diagnosis of cancer (negative biopsies) were twice as high in the United States than in the United Kingdom. Based on a 10-year period of screening 1000 women aged 50 to 59 years, 477, 433, and 175 women in the BCSC, NBCCEDP, and NHSBSP, respectively, would be recalled; and for women aged 60 to 69 years, 396, 334, and 133 women, respectively. The estimated cancer detection rates per 1000 women aged 50 to 59 years were 24.5, 23.8, and 19.4, respectively, and for women aged 60 to 69 years, 31.5, 26.6, and 27.9, respectively.ConclusionsRecall and negative open surgical biopsy rates are twice as high in US settings than in the United Kingdom but cancer detection rates are similar. Efforts to improve US mammographic screening should target lowering the recall rate without reducing the cancer detection rate.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does individual programme size affect screening performance? Results from the United Kingdom NHS breast screening programmeJournal of Medical Screening, 2002
- Breast cancer screening programmes in 22 countries: current policies, administration and guidelines. International Breast Cancer Screening Network (IBSN) and the European Network of Pilot Projects for Breast Cancer ScreeningInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1998
- American College of Radiology guidelines for breast cancer screening.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1998
- The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1998
- Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: a national mammography screening and outcomes database.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1997
- American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of breast cancer: update 1997.CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 1997
- Likelihood ratios for modern screening mammography. Risk of breast cancer based on age and mammographic interpretationPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1996
- Screening mammography in community practice: positive predictive value of abnormal findings and yield of follow-up diagnostic procedures.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1995
- Current practice of screening mammography in the United States: data from the National Survey of Mammography Facilities.Radiology, 1994
- Medical audit of a rapid-throughput mammography screening practice: methodology and results of 27,114 examinations.Radiology, 1990