Quantitative and empirical demonstration of the Matthew effect in a study of career longevity
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 20 December 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 108 (1) , 18-23
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1016733108
Abstract
The Matthew effect refers to the adage written some two-thousand years ago in the Gospel of St. Matthew: “For to all those who have, more will be given.” Even two millennia later, this idiom is used by sociologists to qualitatively describe the dynamics of individual progress and the interplay between status and reward. Quantitative studies of professional careers are traditionally limited by the difficulty in measuring progress and the lack of data on individual careers. However, in some professions, there are well-defined metrics that quantify career longevity, success, and prowess, which together contribute to the overall success rating for an individual employee. Here we demonstrate testable evidence of the age-old Matthew “ rich get richer ” effect, wherein the longevity and past success of an individual lead to a cumulative advantage in further developing his or her career. We develop an exactly solvable stochastic career progress model that quantitatively incorporates the Matthew effect and validate our model predictions for several competitive professions. We test our model on the careers of 400,000 scientists using data from six high-impact journals and further confirm our findings by testing the model on the careers of more than 20,000 athletes in four sports leagues. Our model highlights the importance of early career development, showing that many careers are stunted by the relative disadvantage associated with inexperience.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diffusion of scientific credits and the ranking of scientistsPhysical Review E, 2009
- Computational Social ScienceScience, 2009
- A Poissonian explanation for heavy tails in e-mail communicationProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impactProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- Robust dynamic classes revealed by measuring the response function of a social systemProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- Understanding individual human mobility patternsNature, 2008
- Preferential attachment in sexual networksProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007
- Generalized comparison of graph-based ranking algorithms for publications and authorsJournal of Systems and Software, 2006
- Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's lawContemporary Physics, 2005
- Matthew Effects in EducationAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1983