A defence of medical paternalism: maximising patients' autonomy.
Open Access
- 1 March 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Medical Ethics
- Vol. 9 (1) , 38-44
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.9.1.38
Abstract
All illness represents a state of diminished autonomy and therefore the doctor-patient relationship necessarily and justifiably involves a degree of medical paternalism argues the author, an American medical student. In a broad-ranging paper he discusses the concepts of autonomy and paternalism in the context of the doctor-patient relationship. Given the necessary diminution of autonomy which illness inflicts, a limited form of medical paternalism, aimed at restoring or maximising the patient's autonomy is entirely acceptable, and indeed fundamental to the relationship he argues. However, the exercise of this paternalism should be flexible and related to the current 'level of autonomy' of the patient himself. An editorial in this issue comments briefly on this paper.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Searching for moral certainty in medicine: a proposal for a new model of the doctor-patient encounter.1981
- The breast cancer controversy & its implications for the informed consent doctrineJournal of Legal Medicine, 1980
- Public Challenge of Physician AuthorityMedical Care, 1979
- Toward a Reconstruction of Medical Morality: The Primacy of the Act of Profession and the Fact of IllnessJournal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1979
- An ethical approach to paternalism in the physician-patient relationship.1977
- Medical ethics and the hopelessly ill childThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1976
- Paternalistic behavior.1976
- Cooper v. Roberts: a "reasonable patient" test for informed consent.1973
- A Contribution to the Philosophy of medicineA.M.A. Archives of Internal Medicine, 1956