The Carrot or the Stick for School Desegregation Policy?
- 1 March 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Urban Affairs Quarterly
- Vol. 25 (3) , 474-499
- https://doi.org/10.1177/004208169002500308
Abstract
The relevance of the public-choice model of decision making for school desegregation is tested by comparing the desegregation effectiveness of voluntary plans, which depend on parents choosing magnet schools, to mandatory reassignment plans, which "force" parents to send their children to desegregated schools. A desegregation plan based primarily on voluntary transfers to magnet schools will produce greater long-term interracial exposure than a mandatory reassignment plan with magnet components, in part because of the greater white flight from the mandatory plans. In short, the public-choice model of decision making is more successful in producing interracial exposure than the command-and-control model.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Estimating the Net Benefit of School Desegregation ReassignmentsEducational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1985
- Applied Social Science Research: What Does It Say about the Effectiveness of School Desegregation Plans?The Journal of Legal Studies, 1983
- Reducing Racial Isolation in Large School DistrictsUrban Education, 1983
- Self-Interest versus Racial Attitudes as Correlates of Anti-Busing Attitudes in Louisville: Is it The Buses or the Blacks?The Journal of Politics, 1982
- Policy Alternatives for Minimizing White FlightEducational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1982
- Magnet Schools as a Desegregation ToolUrban Education, 1979
- Desegregation Rulings and Public Attitude Changes: White Resistance or Resignation?American Journal of Sociology, 1978
- Trends in Residential Segregation: 1960-1970American Journal of Sociology, 1977
- On "The Politics of School Busing"Public Opinion Quarterly, 1977
- Dilemmas Over Racial Integration: Status Consciousness vs. Direct Threat*Sociological Inquiry, 1975