How Much Structure in Empirical Models?
Preprint
- 1 October 2007
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
This chapter highlights the problems that structural methods and SVAR approaches have when estimating DSGE models and examining their ability to capture important features of the data. We show that structural methods are subject to severe identification problems due, in large part, to the nature of DSGE models. The problems can be patched up in a number of ways but solved only if DSGEs are completely reparametrized or respecified. The potential misspecification of the structural relationships give Bayesian methods an hedge over classical ones in structural estimation. SVAR approaches may face invertibility problems but simple diagnostics can help to detect and remedy these problems. A pragmatic empirical approach ought to use the flexibility of SVARs against potential misspecification of the structural relationships but must firmly tie SVARs to the class of DSGE models which could have have generated the data.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Do Expectations Matter? The Great Moderation RevisitedSSRN Electronic Journal, 2008
- Bayesian Analysis of DSGE ModelsEconometric Reviews, 2007
- DSGE Models in a Data-Rich EnvironmentPublished by National Bureau of Economic Research ,2006
- Has Monetary Policy Become More Effective?The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2006
- What VAR Tell us about DSGE Models?Published by Springer Nature ,2005
- Monetary disturbances matter for business fluctuations in the G-7Journal of Monetary Economics, 2002
- Sensitivity Analysis and Model Evaluation in Simulated Dynamic General Equilibrium EconomiesInternational Economic Review, 1995
- Misspecifications in vector autoregressions and their effects on impulse responses and variance decompositionsJournal of Econometrics, 1993
- The Dynamic Effects of Aggregate Demand and Supply DisturbancesPublished by National Bureau of Economic Research ,1988
- Alternative explanations of the money-income correlationCarnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1986