Glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes: the impact of body weight, beta-cell function and patient education
Open Access
- 1 March 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in QJM: An International Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 93 (3) , 183-190
- https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/93.3.183
Abstract
We examined the determinants of glycaemic control in a consecutive cohort of 562 newly‐referred Chinese type 2 diabetic patients (57% women) during a 12‐month period. All patients underwent a structured assessment with documentation of clinical and biochemical characteristics. Pancreatic β‐cell function was assessed by fasting plasma C‐peptide concentration. Insulin deficiency was defined as fasting plasma C‐peptide n=396) were on drug therapy (9% on insulin and 62.8% on oral agents), 20.6% (n=116) were on diet and 9% (n=50) had not received any form of treatment. The mean HbAlc was 8.4±2.3%. The geometric mean (×/÷ antilog SD) of IR was 4.62×/÷2.51 (range 0.63–162.7) and correlated only with waist : hip ratio (WHR, p=0.008). The geometric mean of plasma C peptide was 0.47×/÷2.89 nmol/l and correlated with BMI (pp=0.013), disease duration (pppppp=0.001) and higher among smokers (8.9% vs. 8.2%, p=0.003). Compared to insulin‐deficient patients (n=118), non‐insulin‐deficient patients (n=413) had features resembling that of the Metabolic Syndrome with increased WHR (p=0.005), blood pressure (pp=0.001) and were older (p=0.04). Amongst the insulin‐deficient patients, 27% were treated with oral agents or diet. Patients receiving appropriate therapy (n=362) had a lower HbAlc than those treated inappropriately (n=173) (8.2% vs. 8.7%, p=0.02). On multivariate analysis, short disease duration (ppp=0.001), diabetes education (pp=0.014) and choice of appropriate treatment (p=0.009) were the independent determinants of good glycaemic control.This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33)The Lancet, 1998
- United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study 24: A 6-Year, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Sulfonylurea, Insulin, and Metformin Therapy in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes That Could Not Be Controlled with Diet TherapyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1998
- IS GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING BENEFICIAL IN NON-INSULIN-TREATED DIABETIC-PATIENTS - RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE TRIAL1989
- Stopping Insulin Treatment in Middle-aged Diabetic Patients with High Postglucagon Plasma C-PeptideActa Medica Scandinavica, 1988
- EFFECT OF AN INPATIENT EDUCATION-PROGRAM UPON THE KNOWLEDGE, BEHAVIOR AND GLYCEMIC CONTROL OF INSULIN-DEPENDENT DIABETIC-PATIENTS1987
- GLUCAGON-C-PEPTIDE TEST AS A MEASURE OF INSULIN REQUIREMENT IN TYPE-2 DIABETES - EVALUATION OF STOPPING INSULIN THERAPY IN 11 PATIENTS1987
- Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and ?-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in manDiabetologia, 1985
- Practical Clinical Value of the C‐Peptide Response to Glucagon Stimulation in the Choice of Treatment in Diabetes MellitusActa Medica Scandinavica, 1981
- SELF-MONITORING OF BLOOD-GLUCOSEThe Lancet, 1978
- HOME MONITORING OF BLOOD-GLUCOSEThe Lancet, 1978