Special Ethical Issues in the Management of PVS Patients
- 1 January 1992
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Law, Medicine and Health Care
- Vol. 20 (1-2) , 104-115
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720x.1992.tb01177.x
Abstract
The patient in a persistent vegetative state (hereafter, the PVS patient) has played a central role in recent American bioethical discussions and in recent litigation involving bioethical issues. From Quinlan’ to Cruzan and Wanglie, some of the most important cases involving ethical issues at the end of life have involved PVS patients. Major American medical groups such as the AMA and the American Academy of Neurology have adopted important policy statements on the care of such patients, statements that have been followed by at least one European group.I have always found this activity a bit of a mystery. There is, after all, a relatively clear consensus about decision-making at the end of life, a consensus embodied in such documents as a report from the President's Commission and a report from the Hastings Center.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Guidelines for the Appropriate Use of Do-Not-Resuscitate OrdersJAMA, 1991
- Death and DignityNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Persistent Vegetative State and the Decision to Withdraw or Withhold Life SupportPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1990
- The President's Commission: The Need to Be More PhilosophicalJournal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1989
- Position of the Ameerican Academy of Neurology on certain aspects of the care and management of the persistent vegetative state patientNeurology, 1989
- Differences in cerebral blood flow and glucose utilization in vegetative versus locked‐in patientsAnnals of Neurology, 1987
- When Patients Request Specific InterventionsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Choices about Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the HospitalNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- On Feeding the DyingHastings Center Report, 1983
- Fuzzy setsInformation and Control, 1965