Evaluation of the Digital Rectal Examination as a Screening Test for Prostate Cancer
Open Access
- 2 December 1998
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Vol. 90 (23) , 1817-1823
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/90.23.1817
Abstract
Background: The utility of digital rectal examination (DRE) as a screening test for early detection of prostate cancer has not been established. Therefore, we evaluated the usefulness of DRE as a stand-alone screening test and in conjunction with measured serum prostate- specific antigen (PSA) levels of 0-3.9 ng/mL and transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS). Methods: Our study population consisted of 10 523 men aged 54-76 years who were randomly assigned to the screening arm of the Rotterdam, The Netherlands, section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. The underlying prevalence of detectable prostate cancer was estimated by logistic regression analysis and used for calculating the sensitivity of DRE as a test. Pathologic characteristics of 105 radical prostatectomy specimens were used to determine the aggressiveness of the tumors diagnosed (and missed) by DRE. Results: The overall detection rate for prostate cancer in this population when serum PSA measurement, DRE, and TRUS were used was 4.5%, and the detection rate with DRE alone was 2.5%. The positive predictive value of DRE ranged from 4% to 11% in men with PSA levels of 0-2.9 ng/mL and from 33% to 83% in men with PSA levels of 3.0-9.9 ng/mL or more. Most tumors detected by DRE in men with PSA levels of less than 4.0 ng/mL were small (mean volumes = 0.24-0.83 mL), and most were well differentiated (Gleason scores of 6 or less). Minimal, moderate, and advanced cancers were seen in 42%, 42%, and 16% of men, respectively, with a PSA level of 4.0 ng/ mL or less. DRE alone allowed detection of 264 (55.8%) of 473 cancers; 82 (17.3%) of the 473 cancers would have remained undetected by PSA-based screening alone (i.e., no follow-up procedures for PSA values of 0-3.9 ng/ mL). Conclusions: For PSA values of 0-3.9 ng/mL, the positive predictive value and sensitivity of DRE, tumor volume, and tumor grade were strongly dependent on PSA level. DRE has a poor performance in low PSA ranges.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of pathologic characteristics of T1c and non-Tic cancers detected in a population-based screening study, the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancerWorld Journal of Urology, 1997
- Prospective Evaluation Plan for Randomised Trials of Prostate Cancer ScreeningJournal of Medical Screening, 1996
- The fall in incidence of prostate carcinoma: On the down side of a prostate specific antigen induced peak in incidence--Data from the Utah Cancer RegistryCancer, 1996
- European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer—The Rotterdam pilot studiesInternational Journal of Cancer, 1996
- Prostate Cancer Screening in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial of the National Cancer InstituteJournal of Urology, 1994
- Ethics of a prostate cancer screening trialThe Lancet, 1994
- Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer by Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Systematic BiopsiesJournal of Urology, 1992
- Serum Prostate Specific Antigen as Pre-Screening Test for Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 1992
- Histologic grading of prostate cancer: A perspectiveHuman Pathology, 1992
- The TNM classification of prostate cancerThe Prostate, 1992