Interactions between fish, grazing invertebrates and algae in a New Zealand stream: a trophic cascade mediated by fish-induced changes to grazer behaviour?

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Experiments in laboratory stream channels compared the behaviour of Deleatidium mayfly nymphs in the absence of fish with that in the presence of either native common river galaxias (Galaxias vulgaris Stokell) or introduced brown trout (Salmo trutta L.). Galaxias present similar predation risks to prey during day and night but are more active at night. Whereas, trout present a higher predation risk during the day. Deleatidium maintained a fixed nocturnal drift periodicity that is characteristic of streams containing visually feeding fish regardless of the nature of the predation regime presented in the laboratory. However, the number on the substratum surface, and therefore able to graze algae, was lower when fish were present than when they were absent. The number was lower during the day in the presence of trout, when they present the highest predation risk, and lower during the night compared to the day in trials with galaxias when galaxias activity disturbs Deleatidium from the substratum. Increases in the probability of Deleatidium leaving a patch, reductions in the proportion of mayflies on high quality patches and reductions in the distance travelled from refuge also reflected variations in the predation regime. Similar differences in positioning were observed under the same predation regimes in in situ channels in the Shag River and these were associated with differences in algal biomass. Algal ash-free dry mass (AFDM) and chlorophyll a (chl a) were higher on the tops of cobbles when fish were present. Fish also affected the biomass and the distribution of algae on cobbles as AFDM and chl a were higher on the sides of cobbles from channels with trout compared to those with galaxias. Changes in grazing behaviour, caused by predator avoidance, are likely to have been responsible for differences in algal biomass because no significant differences were detected between treatments in the biomass of Deleatidium or of total invertebrates.