Relevance of Carbohydrate-Deficient Transferrin as a Predictor of Alcoholism in Intensive Care Patients following Trauma

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Every second traumatized patient is a chronic alcoholic. Chronic alcoholics are at risk due to an increased morbidity and mortality. Reliable and precise diagnostic methods for detecting alcoholism are mandatory to prevent posttraumatic complications by adequate prophylaxis. The patient's history, however, is often not reliable, and conventional laboratory markers are not sensitive or specific enough. The aim of this study was to investigate whether carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) is a sensitive and specific marker to detect alcoholism in traumatized patients. One hundred and five male traumatized patients or their relatives gave their written informed consent to participate in this institutionally approved study. All patients were transferred to the intensive care unit after admission to the emergency room, followed by surgical treatment. Diagnostics included an alcoholism-related questionnaire, conventional laboratory markers (mean corpuscular volume, gamma-glutamyl-transferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase), and CDT sampling (microanion-exchange chromatography, turbidimetry, and radioimmunoassay, respectively). Only patients in whom a reliable history could be obtained were included. Alcoholism was diagnosed if the patients met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders criteria for chronic alcohol abuse or dependence. The administration of fluids before CDT sampling was carefully documented. Patients did not differ significantly regarding age, Trauma and Injury Severity Score, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score. The sensitivity of the CDT research kit was 70% and of the commercially available kit CDTect was 65%. Early sampling in the emergency room and before administration of large volumes of fluid increased the sensitivity to 83% for the CDT research kit and 74% for CDTect, respectively. The specificity of the CDT research kit was 100% and of the commercially available kit CDTect was 95%. The positive predictive value was 100% for the CDT research kit and 94% for CDTect, the negative predictive value was 73% for the CDT research kit and 69% for CDTect. CDT was more sensitive and specific in detecting alcoholism than any other conventional marker.