Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A double‐blind trial
Open Access
- 8 December 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Vol. 48 (12) , 3328-3337
- https://doi.org/10.1002/art.11363
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus as monotherapy in controlling the signs and symptoms of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods This was a 6‐month, phase III, double‐blind, multicenter study. Patients with active RA who had discontinued all disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for an appropriate washout period (at least 1 month) and who, after the washout period, had a stable joint count (at least 10 tender/painful joints and 7 swollen joints) were stratified according to DMARD intolerance or DMARD resistance, and randomized to receive a single daily oral dose of placebo, tacrolimus 2 mg, or tacrolimus 3 mg. Results A total of 464 patients received at least 1 dose of study drug. Baseline characteristics were similar among the 3 treatment groups. American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement (ACR20) success (defined as completion of 6 months of treatment and an ACR20 response at the month 6 visit) for the placebo, tacrolimus 2 mg, and tacrolimus 3 mg groups was 10.2%, 18.8% (P < 0.05 versus placebo), and 26.8% (P < 0.0005 versus placebo), respectively. At the end of treatment, the ACR20 and ACR50 response rates in the 3‐mg group were 32.0% (P < 0.005 versus placebo) and 11.8% (P < 0.05 versus placebo), respectively. DMARD‐intolerant patients had better ACR response rates than did DMARD‐resistant patients. Although serum creatinine levels increased by ≥40% from baseline at some time during the trial in 20% and 29% of patients receiving tacrolimus 2 mg/day and 3 mg/day, respectively, the serum creatinine level remained within the normal range throughout the trial in ∼90% of patients. Conclusion Tacrolimus, at dosages of both 2 mg/day and 3 mg/day, is efficacious and safe as monotherapy for patients with active RA, but treatment with the 3‐mg dose of tacrolimus resulted in generally better ACR response rates.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tacrolimus in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving concomitant methotrexateArthritis & Rheumatism, 2003
- Efficacy of tacrolimus in rheumatoid arthritis patients who have been treated unsuccessfully with methotrexate: A six‐month, double‐blind, randomized, dose‐ranging studyArthritis & Rheumatism, 2002
- American college of rheumatology preliminary definition of improvement in rheumatoid arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1995
- The american college of rheumatology 1991 revised criteria for the classification of global functional status in rheumatoid arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1992
- Low-dose cyclosporin versus placebo in patients with rheumatoid arthritisThe Lancet, 1990
- The Influence of FK-506 and Low-Concentration Ciclosporin on Human Lymphocyte Activation Antigen Expression and Blastogenesis: a Flow Cytometric AnalysisScandinavian Journal of Immunology, 1990
- The american rheumatism association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1988
- The safety and efficacy of the use of methotrexate in long‐term therapy for rheumatoid arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1986
- Efficacy of Low-Dose Methotrexate in Rheumatoid ArthritisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Measurement of patient outcome in arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1980