Remarks on marine and continental biogeography: an areographical viewpoint
Open Access
- 29 January 1994
- journal article
- Published by The Royal Society in Philosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
- Vol. 343 (1303) , 71-78
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1994.0009
Abstract
Differences and similarities in the way marine and continental organisms occupy space are briefly reviewed. Among them, the ‘peninsula effect’ (the decline of species richness with distance from the source) is compared with the ‘bay effect’. Two cases, corals in Mochima Bay, Venezuela and fishes in the Baltic Sea, are presented as examples. The facts that the world’s oceans are larger, continuous and three-dimensional, with fewer evident geographical barriers than there are on land, explain why marine biogeographical regions are less welldefined and geographical ranges of marine taxa more wide-spread. I his generalization has, however, been questioned following recent findings of extremely rich and highly endemic benthic faunas. This problem is discussed using an index of cosmopolitanism to compare terrestrial and marine biotas.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Species Diversity and Dispersal of Benthic ForaminiferaBioScience, 1991
- A Test of Criteria for Introduced Species: the Global Invasion by the Isopod Synidotea Laevidorsalis (Miers, 1881)Journal of Crustacean Biology, 1991
- Evolution of Species Assemblages: Effects of Energetic Constraints and Species Dynamics on the Diversification of the North American AvifaunaThe American Naturalist, 1987
- The Peninsular Effect in Baja California: An Entomological AssessmentJournal of Biogeography, 1987
- Temperature responses of some North AtlanticCladophora species (Chlorophyceae) in relation to their geographic distributionHelgoland Marine Research, 1984
- Genetic Variability in the Pelagic Environment: A Paradox?Ecology, 1979