Endpoints in cancer clinical trials: is there a need for measuring quality of life?
- 1 January 1995
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Supportive Care in Cancer
- Vol. 3 (1) , 23-27
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00343917
Abstract
A review of the possible reasons to measure quality of life in cancer patients as well as reasons not to measure it is presented. These are considered in the context that standard endpoints already exist in cancer clinical trials and have served us well. Quality-of-life assessments might best be utilized in trials in which survival differences between treatments are expected to be small, which is frequently the case. Although more data are required to establish properly the true value of quality-of-life measurement in cancer clinical trials, such measurements should be encouraged.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- How To Compare Quality of Life of Breast Cancer Patients in Clinical TrialsPublished by Springer Nature ,1993
- Quality of life assessment for cost/utility studies in cancerCancer Treatment Reviews, 1993
- Quality of Life in Cancer: Definition, Purpose, and Method of MeasurementCancer Investigation, 1993
- Prognostic implications of quality of lifeCancer Treatment Reviews, 1993
- Quality-of-Life Assessment in Cancer Treatment Protocols: Research Issues in Protocol DevelopmentJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1992
- Is there a role for preference assessments in research on quality of life in oncology?Quality of Life Research, 1992
- Guidelines and caveats for quality of life measurement in clinical practice and research.1990
- Estimating the quality of life in a clinical trial of patients with metastatic lung cancer using the Karnofsky performance status and the functional living index—cancerCancer, 1988
- Improving the Quality of Life during Chemotherapy for Advanced Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- QUALITY OF LIFE ASSESSMENT OF PATIENTS IN EXTREMITY SARCOMA CLINICAL-TRIALS1982