The Incidence and Severity of Adverse Events Affecting Patients after Discharge from the Hospital
Top Cited Papers
- 4 February 2003
- journal article
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 138 (3) , 161-167
- https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00007
Abstract
Studies of hospitalized patients identify safety as a significant problem, but few data are available regarding injuries occurring after discharge. Patients may be vulnerable during this transition period. To describe the incidence, severity, preventability, and ameliorability of adverse events affecting patients after discharge from the hospital and to develop strategies for improving patient safety during this interval. Prospective cohort study. A tertiary care academic hospital. 400 consecutive patients discharged home from the general medical service. The three main outcomes were adverse events, defined as injuries occurring as a result of medical management; preventable adverse events, defined as adverse events judged to have been caused by an error; and ameliorable adverse events, defined as adverse events whose severity could have been decreased. Posthospital course was determined by performing a medical record review and a structured telephone interview approximately 3 weeks after each patient's discharge. Outcomes were determined by independent physician reviews. Seventy-six patients had adverse events after discharge (19% [95% CI, 15% to 23%]). Of these, 23 had preventable adverse events (6% [CI, 4% to 9%]) and 24 had ameliorable adverse events (6% [CI, 4% to 9%]). Three percent of injuries were serious laboratory abnormalities, 65% were symptoms, 30% were symptoms associated with a nonpermanent disability, and 3% were permanent disabilities. Adverse drug events were the most common type of adverse event (66% [CI, 55% to 76%]), followed by procedure-related injuries (17% [CI, 8% to 26%]). Of the 25 adverse events resulting in at least a nonpermanent disability, 12 were preventable (48% [CI, 28% to 68%]) and 6 were ameliorable (24% [CI, 7% to 41%]). Adverse events occurred frequently in the peridischarge period, and many could potentially have been prevented or ameliorated with simple strategies.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Estimating Hospital Deaths Due to Medical Errors: Preventability Is in the Eye of the ReviewerSurvey of Anesthesiology, 2002
- Epidemiology of Surgical-Site Infections Diagnosed After Hospital Discharge A Prospective Cohort StudyInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2001
- Hospital Readmissions as a Measure of Quality of Health CareArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2000
- Gaps in the continuity of care and progress on patient safetyBMJ, 2000
- Incidence and Types of Adverse Events and Negligent Care in Utah and ColoradoMedical Care, 2000
- Drug complications in outpatientsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2000
- The Hospitalist: A New Medical Specialty?Annals of Internal Medicine, 1999
- SURGICAL WOUND INFECTION SURVEILLANCE: THE IMPORTANCE OF INFECTIONS THAT DEVELOP AFTER HOSPITAL DISCHARGEAnz Journal of Surgery, 1999
- Systems analysis of adverse drug events. ADE Prevention Study GroupPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1995
- The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II: Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N, et al. N Engl J Med 1991 ;324:377-84. Reprint requests: Dr. Lucian L. Leape, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115American Journal of Infection Control, 1992