The power of the standard test for the presence of heterogeneity in meta-analysis
- 15 August 2006
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 25 (15) , 2688-2699
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2481
Abstract
It has been suggested that the standard test for the presence of heterogeneity in meta‐analysis has low power. Although this has been investigated using simulation, there is little direct analytical evidence of the validity of this claim. Using an established approximate distribution for the test statistic, a procedure for obtaining the power of the test is described. From this, a simple formula for the power is obtained. Although this applies to a special case, the formula gives an indication of the power of the test more generally. In particular, for a given significance level, the power can be calibrated in terms of the proportion of the studies' variances that is provided by between‐study variation. A consideration of this quantity confirms that the test does, in general, have low power. It is suggested that practitioners, who wish to conduct the standard test, use the ideas provided in order to investigate the operating characteristics of the test prior to performing it. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Detecting and describing heterogeneity in meta-analysisStatistics in Medicine, 1998
- INCORPORATING VARIABILITY IN ESTIMATES OF HETEROGENEITY IN THE RANDOM EFFECTS MODEL IN META-ANALYSISStatistics in Medicine, 1997
- A LIKELIHOOD APPROACH TO META-ANALYSIS WITH RANDOM EFFECTSStatistics in Medicine, 1996
- Small sample performance of tests of homogeneity of odds ratios in K 2 × 2 tablesStatistics in Medicine, 1992
- A comparison of tests of homogeneity of odds ratios inK2 × 2 tablesStatistics in Medicine, 1989
- A Monte Carlo Investigation of Homogeneity Tests of the Odds Ratio under Various Sample Size ConfigurationsBiometrics, 1989
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986