Candidate Motivation: A Synthesis of Alternative Theories
- 1 March 1983
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 77 (1) , 142-157
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1956016
Abstract
A formal model of electoral behavior is developed under the assumption that candidates have policy preferences as well as an interest in winning per se. This model is shown to have an equilibrium in a k-issue space when there are two candidates. The implications of this model are compared to the implications of the Downsian-type model where candidates are interested only in winning. Testable propositions are derived via the use of comparative statics. The results of recent studies are shown to coincide with the synthesis model but not the pure Downsian model.The theoretical model bridges the gap between formal theory and empirical research and unifies a variety of seemingly unrelated studies.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Candidates and Parties in Congressional ElectionsAmerican Political Science Review, 1980
- Elections and Macroeconomic Policy OptimizationAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1980
- Congressional Behavior and Electoral MarginalityAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1978
- Representativeness and Elections: A Policy AnalysisAmerican Political Science Review, 1978
- District Competitiveness and Legislative Roll-Call Behavior: A Reassessment of the Marginality HypothesisAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1977
- A Method of Scaling with Applications to the 1968 and 1972 Presidential ElectionsAmerican Political Science Review, 1977
- Political contribution and policy — Some extensionsPublic Choice, 1975
- Party and Incumbency in Postwar Senate Elections: Trends, Patterns, and ModelsAmerican Political Science Review, 1973
- Internal processes governing party positions in electionsPublic Choice, 1971
- Ideology, public approval, and government behaviorPublic Choice, 1971