Comparative study of four antacids
Open Access
- 1 September 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Postgraduate Medical Journal
- Vol. 60 (707) , 592-596
- https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.60.707.592
Abstract
Summary: Four antacid preparations have been studied in a stratified, randomized, double-blind trial to evaluate criteria which determine patients' acceptance of this type of therapy. There was a considerable range of judgements about palatability, but preference was determined not only by factors such as the smell, taste, texture and after-taste of the preparation, but also by the order in which the antacids were tested and by the age and sex of the patient. The preparations also differed considerably in acid-neutralizing capacity and ability to bind bile salts, as well as cost. We conclude that individuals requiring antacid therapy should be allowed to chose from among a range of preparations, in order to maximize compliance.This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- WHY DO APPARENTLY HEALTHY PEOPLE USE ANTACID TABLETS1983
- Reflux EsophagitisScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1982
- Age and sex effects on taste of sucrose, NaCl, citric acid and caffeineNeurobiology of Aging, 1981
- Age-related changes in flavor perceptionAppetite, 1981
- Antacids for duodenal ulcer.BMJ, 1981
- Antacids and peptic ulcer--a reappraisal.Gut, 1979
- Rational Treatment of OesophagitisDrugs, 1978
- ALGINATE/ANTACID IN THE REDUCTION OF GASTRO-$OElig;SOPHAGEAL REFLUXThe Lancet, 1974
- In Vivo and in Vitro Evaluation of Liquid AntacidsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1973